http://sidesandassociates.com/blog/2010/01/01/the-business-of-sequencing/ Just another WordPress weblog Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:14:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://sidesandassociates.com/blog/2010/01/01/the-business-of-sequencing/comment-page-1/#comment-4 PolITiGenomics » Blog Archive » Next-Generation Sequencing Informatics Update Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:55:33 +0000 http://sidesandassociates.com/blog/?p=16#comment-4 [...] GA IIx. Also, the Sides & Associates blog linked to my table and referred to it as a “somewhat dated comparison of next-generation sequencing platforms.” Just to clarify, this table represents average throughput for production systems; not [...] [...] GA IIx. Also, the Sides & Associates blog linked to my table and referred to it as a “somewhat dated comparison of next-generation sequencing platforms.” Just to clarify, this table represents average throughput for production systems; not [...]

]]> http://sidesandassociates.com/blog/2010/01/01/the-business-of-sequencing/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Alejandro Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:48:46 +0000 http://sidesandassociates.com/blog/?p=16#comment-3 Thanks David. By "dated" I only meant that some of the more recent (announced) systems weren't yet listed, but your clarification about "production" is very helpful. Thanks David. By “dated” I only meant that some of the more recent (announced) systems weren’t yet listed, but your clarification about “production” is very helpful.

]]> http://sidesandassociates.com/blog/2010/01/01/the-business-of-sequencing/comment-page-1/#comment-2 David Dooling Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:45:38 +0000 http://sidesandassociates.com/blog/?p=16#comment-2 I would just like to defend my "somewhat dated" comparison of next-generation sequencing blogs. All of the numbers in that table are up to date, at least as far as <em>production</em> systems are concerned. With testing reagents/software/protocols, these instruments are able to achieve higher yields, but until it is reality (i.e., average performance) it does not get put into the table. That said, thanks for the link. I would just like to defend my “somewhat dated” comparison of next-generation sequencing blogs. All of the numbers in that table are up to date, at least as far as production systems are concerned. With testing reagents/software/protocols, these instruments are able to achieve higher yields, but until it is reality (i.e., average performance) it does not get put into the table. That said, thanks for the link.

]]>